Archive for the ‘Stimulus’ Category

More Obama Fine Print

By: admin
Published: September 20th, 2011

From Jamie Dupree’s Washington blog

The headlines on the President’s new deficit plan are all about taxes on the wealthy and all kinds of budget savings. But the real news is buried in an 80 page document from the White House that lists dozens of changes that will impact a variety of industries.

Knowing that most of you won’t read through the whole document from the Obama Administration, I thought I would list all the areas where savings are proposed by the President

  • Increase pension contributions by federal workers ($20.7 billion)

  • Increase pharmacy co-pays for military health care ($15.1 billion)

  • Start an annual premium fee for TRICARE signup ($6.7 billion)

  • Increase fees charged by Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac ($27.5 billion)

  • Increase airline ticket fees for airport security ($15 billion)

  • New fee to pay for Air Traffic Control system ($10.9 billion)

  • Various Postal Service reforms ($18.5 billion)

  • New safeguards for worker retirement benefits ($16 billion)

  • Reform the National Flood Insurance Program ($4.1 billion)

  • National Wireless Initiative ($7 billion)

  • Dispose of unneeded government property ($4.1 billion)

  • Improve pension information collection ($3.1 billion)

  • Strengthen IRS tax enforcement ($3.2 billion)

  • Strengthen Treasury debt collection ($911 million)

  • Reform Abandoned Mine Lands programs ($1.2 billion)

  • Provisions on Unemployment Insurance system ($32.9 billion)

  • Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee ($30 billion)

  • New pesticide registration fees ($816 million)

  • Charge for use of hazardous waste e-system ($31 million)

  • Special assessment on nuclear power utilities ($2.1 billion)

  • Repeal oil and gas R&D program ($150 million)

  • Savings at Department of Interior ($1.6 billion)

  • Raise diesel fuel tax for boats ($1.1 billion)

    Health Savings:

  • Reduce Medicare coverage of patients’ bad debts ($20 billion)

  • Changes in Medical Education payments ($9.1 billion)

  • End extra payments to rural providers ($2.1 billion)

  • Reduce Critical Access Hospital payments ($1 billion)

  • Change rules on Critical Access designation ($3 billion)

  • Adjust payments for some post-acute care ($32.5 billion)

  • Equalize certainly Medicare payments ($4.5 billion)

  • Encourage better use of inpatient rehab ($2.6 billion)

  • Adjust skilled nursing facility payments ($2 billion)

  • Match Medicare & Medicaid drug payment policies ($135 billion)

  • Recover wrongful Medicare payments ($2.3 billion)

  • Reduce Medicare waste, fraud & abuse ($500 million)

  • Penalties for failure to use e-health records ($500 million)

  • Medicare payments dealing with advanced imaging ($400 million)

  • Require prior okay for advanced imaging ($900 million)

  • Medicare “Interactions” ($7 billion)

  • Increase “income-related premiums” for Parts B & D ($20 billion)

  • Modify Part B deductible for new enrolles ($1 billion)

  • New Medicare ‘home health copayments’ ($400 million)

  • Part B premium surcharge for some beneficiaries ($2.5 billion)

  • Reduce the Medicaid provider tax threshold ($26.3 billion)

  • Single blended matching rate to Medicaid & CHIP ($14.9 billion)

  • Limit Medicaid reimbursement of durable medical equipment ($4.2 billion)

  • Strengthen Medicaid third party liability ($1.3 billion)

  • Alter Disproportionate Share Hospital allotments ($4.1 billion)

  • Reduce waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid ($110 million)

  • Change income determination for benefits ($14.6 billion)

  • Ban ‘pay for delay’ Rx agreements ($2.7 billion)

  • Reduce exclusivity for generic biologics ($3.5 billion)

  • Streamline FEHBP pharmacy benefit contracting ($1.6 billion)

  • Prevention and Public Health Fund investments ($3.5 billion)

  • Accelerate State Innovation Waivers ($4 billion)

  • Cut administrative costs ($400 million) Tax Reform Provisions:

  • Allow Bush tax cuts to expire for wealthy and return estate tax to 2009 levels ($866 billion)

  • Limit deductions for high income earners ($410 billion)

  • Change tax treatment for hedge fund income ($12.5 billion)

  • End special depreciation for corporate jets ($4.65 billion)

  • Repeal oil and natural gas percentage depletion ($10.4 billion)

  • Repeal oil and natural gas domestic deduction ($16.4 billion)

  • Repeal expensing of intangible drilling costs ($12.8 billion)

  • Repeal deduction for tertiary injectants ($83 million)

  • Repeal oil and gas exception on passive loss ($187 million)

  • Increase amortization for independent producers ($1.5 billion)

  • Modify rules for dual capacity taxpayers ($9.9 billion)

    Close Business Loopholes:

  • Repeal LIFO method of inventory accounting ($51.8 billion)

  • Repeal LCM inventory accounting method ($8.2 billion)

  • Repeal coal industry exploration expensing ($411 million)

  • Repeal coal percentage depletion ($1.1 billion)

  • Repeal capital gains treatment for royalties ($353 million)

  • Repeal coal industry domestic deduction ($389 million)

  • Modify rules on sales of life insurance ($929 million)

  • Modify “Dividend-received-deduction” ($5.48 billion)

  • Expand life insurance interest expense disallowance ($5.6 billion)

    Changes in U.S. International Tax System

  • Defer deduction of interest on deferred income ($35.6 billion)

  • Determine foreign tax credit on pooling basis ($52.8 billion)

  • Tax changes dealing with offshore intangibiles ($19.1 billion)

  • Limit income shifting through property transfers ($1.2 billion)

  • Limit earnings stripping by expatriated entities ($3.9 billion)

    Other changes:

  • Reinstates Superfund taxes ($18.7 billion)

  • Makes 0.2% unemployment insurance surtax permanent ($14.6 billion)

  • Increase certainly on worker classification ($7.7 billion)

    Total tax provisions – $1.57 trillion

  • VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

    More on this topic (What's this?)
    Obama’s Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low
    West Virginians Protest Obama's 'War On Coal'
    80% of Americans Want Higher Taxes
    Read more on Obama's Presidential Policy at Wikinvest

    National debt has increased $4 trillion under Obama

    By: admin
    Published: August 22nd, 2011

    From CBS News

    The latest posting by the Treasury Department shows the national debt has now increased $4 trillion on President Obama’s watch.

    The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

    It’s the most rapid increase in the debt under any U.S. president.

    The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush. The debt now is rising at a pace to surpass that amount during Mr. Obama’s four-year term.

    Mr. Obama blames policies inherited from his predecessor’s administration for the soaring debt. He singles out:

    • “two wars we didn’t pay for”
    • “a prescription drug program for seniors…we didn’t pay for.”
    • “tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 that were not paid for.”

    Still blaming the others for his mistakes….

    Just look at what waste of money was the stimulus plan…. Whoever asked to get free money from the government to “create” jobs  was given the money and never accounted for what they did with them….

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

    Goldman Sachs’ Suspicious Spending Call

    By: admin
    Published: February 27th, 2011

    From Investors Business Daily

    A major Wall Street investment bank says budget cuts pushed by the GOP could slash economic growth. If it were anyone other than Goldman Sachs making the prediction, maybe we’d believe it.

    In a news-making forecast, the bank says Republicans’ plan to trim $61 billion — out of an estimated deficit of $1.5 trillion on spending of $3.8 trillion — could lower U.S. GDP growth by as much as 2 percentage points as the year goes on.

    “This nonpartisan study proves that the House Republicans’ proposal is a recipe for a double-dip recession,” Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer quickly remarked. “This analysis puts a dagger through the heart of their ‘cut-and-grow’ fantasy.”

    This, of course, is true only if you buy into the Keynesian premise that a $1 increase in government spending leads to a greater than $1 increase in economic output.

    That idea has been disproved and roundly criticized after the Obama administration blithely predicted $2.50 in economic activity for every $1 in added government “stimulus.”

    We’ve spent trillions more, but have little in the way of growth or jobs to show for it.

    The theory has proved so laughably false that not even its most fervent proponents try to defend it anymore — with the exception of divorced-from-reality politicians such as Schumer.

    Harvard University economist Robert Barro and Stanford University’s John Taylor have done separate studies estimating far lower “multipliers” for government spending. Other economists have done the same.

    Their work shows that more government spending, by taking money out of the private sector, is a loss to the economy and that taking money away from government is a gain. Since that clearly reflects reality, we’re inclined to agree with it.

    We could stop there, but there’s another reason we disagree with Goldman Sachs: The conflict it has when it comes to making forecasts based on government policy.

    The revolving door between Goldman and government is well-known. An investigative report last year by CBS News counted “at least four dozen former employees, lobbyists or advisers at the highest reaches of power both in Washington and around the world.”

    They include former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who crafted the stimulus plan and Wall Street bailouts; former Democratic House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt; and former SEC head Arthur Levitt, who as of last year was a paid lobbyist for Goldman.

    No surprise, then, that Goldman Sachs would see even the modest cuts proposed by the GOP as a danger to the economy. With its shifting business ties to government, the cuts would certainly be a danger to them.

    No one on Wall Street did better as a result of the government’s massive, disastrous intervention in the U.S. economy the past two years. Goldman didn’t just see its business grow. It also watched as government regulators selectively let some of its key competitors die.

    The Congressional Budget Office has now raised its estimate for the taxpayers’ cost of the two-year-old economic “stimulus” to a shocking $821 billion.

    The idea that a $61 billion cut in spending threatens the economy’s growth is just plain silly.

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Kuwaiti Ruler Grants $3500 to Each Citizen, Free Food to All for More Than a Year!

    By: admin
    Published: January 18th, 2011

    Remember those guys? US spent billions to free them from the Saddam Hussein’s  occupation forces. It seems all is good in their country….

    From Yahoo

    KUWAIT CITY (AFP) – Kuwait’s Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Sabah on Monday ordered the distribution of $4 billion and free food for 14 months to citizens as the oil-rich emirate prepares to mark national occasions.

    Each of the 1.12 million native citizens will get 1,000 dinars ($3,572) in cash as well as free essential food items until March 31, 2012, the KUNA news agency cited state minister for cabinet affairs Rudhan al-Rudhan as saying.

    The Gulf state, whose financial assets top $300 billion, will next month mark the 50th anniversary of independence, 20th anniversary of liberation from Iraqi occupation and the fifth anniversary of the emir’s ascendance to power.

    The announcement was made following an overnight meeting of the cabinet. The 2.4 million foreign residents of Kuwait are excluded from the grant and the free food.

    Inflation in Kuwait soared to 5.9 percent in November, the highest in 20 months on the back of high food prices which rose by 12.3 percent.

    The fifth largest OPEC producer has posted budget surpluses in each of the past 11 fiscal years, totalling more than $140 billion, and is also headed for another healthy surplus this year thanks to rising oil price.

    The government has made similar but smaller grants in the past.

    The Gulf Arab state provides a cradle-to-grave welfare system to its citizens who receive most public services and petrol at heavily subsidised prices and pay no income tax.

    Some 80 percent of Kuwait’s 360,000-strong national workforce are employed in government jobs, where theaverage monthly wage is more than $3,500.

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

    Wind at their backs: Powerful Democrats help Chinese energy firm chase stimulus money

    By: admin
    Published: December 9th, 2010

    Crony capitalism at its best…Change and hope huh?

    From MSNBC
    By Russ Choma

    WASHINGTON — Top Democratic fundraisers and lobbyists with links to the White House are behind a proposed wind farm in Texas that stands to get $450 million in stimulus money, even though a Chinese company would operate the farm and its turbines would be built in China.

    The farm’s backers also have close ties with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who, at the height of his hard-fought re-election bid this fall, helped blunt congressional criticism over stimulus dollars possibly going to create jobs in China by endorsing a proposal by the Chinese company to build a factory in his home state. Although his campaign received thousands of dollars in donations from the wind farm’s backers and Reid stood on stage with them at a campaign event they hosted, his office declined to answer any questions about the wind farm’s organizers or their plans for Nevada.

    The wind farm, first announced more than a year ago, would consist of 300 2-megawatt wind turbines, each perched atop a 26-story-tall steel tower and spinning three blades — each half the length of a football field. The farm would span three counties and 36,000 acres in West Texas land best known for its oil.  Dubbed the Spinning Star wind farm, the project’s 600-megawatt capacity is, theoretically, enough to power 180,000 American homes and would be the sixth-largest wind farm in the country.

    It is being planned by an unusual joint partnership between the U.S. Renewable Energy Group, a Dallas investment firm with strong ties to Washington and the Democratic Party, and A-Power Energy Generation Systems, an upstart Chinese supplier of wind turbines. Filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission indicate the Chinese are bringing financing and the turbines.

    What the Americans are supplying is the local know-how and political clout in Washington, where decisions on how to distribute billions in loan guarantees, stimulus grants and financial incentives are made.

    Story: Reid’s ‘Net betting bill would benefit his casino backers

    The clock is ticking for Spinning Star: To claim the stimulus grant it must arrange its financing and begin work on the wind farm by Dec. 31. Besides the $450 million stimulus grant, A-Power’s SEC filings indicate the joint-venture also will pursue a Department of Energy-backed loan guarantee. According to the SEC filings, the project is waiting to hear if it will receive the loan guarantee before financing will follow to build the turbines.

    Powerful donors to Democrats
    The investment group’s public face is often Cappy McGarr, a wealthy Texas philanthropist, investor and longtime fixture in Democratic politics, who has given heavily to Democratic candidates across the country and was an early backer of President Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. Joining McGarr in Dallas is Ed Cunningham, a former executive for several large Western entertainment companies in China, a 2002 Democratic senatorial candidate and a former member of Obama’s national finance committee.

    Two registered lobbyists with a long history of involvement in Democratic politics, G. John O’Hanlon and Moses Boyd, are the group’s anchors in Washington. O’Hanlon has been a party operative since the 1980s — a protégé of Democratic heavyweight Terry McAuliffe — and has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democratic causes. Boyd is a former senior Democratic Capitol Hill staffer turned lobbyist.

    McGarr married into Democratic Party royalty — his wife’s uncle is legendary Democratic power broker Robert Strauss — and has made his own name as a big-time donor to the party and candidates across the country. McGarr and his wife, Janie Strauss McGarr, have given more than $375,000 to various Democratic candidates and political action committees since 2006, according to Federal Election Commission records. That doesn’t include the $50,000 he donated to Obama’s inauguration and $50,000 to $100,000 in donations from others that he “bundled” for the Obama campaign.

    All told, these four and their spouses have given more than $1.8 million in campaign donations since 1990, with McGarr and his wife accounting for more than half of that.

    “That would place them among the top 100 donors of hard money overall,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, an independent research group that tracks campaign finance and how it affects elections and public policy.

    The important question, however, is not how much they have given, Krumholz said, but “What does this buy them with each individual target of their largesse?”

    The money that McGarr “bundled” in the last election — essentially working on a volunteer basis to solicit money for the Obama presidential campaign — is particularly significant, she said. It’s an important and valuable role to play in a campaign, she said, and one that typically is acknowledged.

    “In some cases,” Krumholz said, bundlers, “maybe are just making very little effort and are ideologically driven, but in many, many cases, historically, these people are looking for access to tap in on. It should not be presumed that this is uninterested work.”

    White House visits
    McGarr’s connections and party loyalty do seem to open doors for him in Washington — and at the White House. McGarr visited the White House at least eight times in the administration’s first 18 months in office, according to visitor records disclosed by the White House. (These disclosures are voluntary, and do not include meetings held with staff outside of the White House, telephone contacts or records that the Obama administration has not released from its first nine months.) Three of the visits were for large social functions hosted by the president, but four were occasions when he met with senior White House staff and presidential advisers.

    Story: Hot air? White House takes credit for Bush-era wind farm jobs

    On Sept. 15, 2009, just weeks before he announced his new renewable energy venture that would tap Obama’s stimulus plan for hundreds of millions of dollars, McGarr met with Pete Rouse, one of three “senior advisers” to the president. Rouse was named acting chief-of-staff in October 2010 after Rahm Emmanuel announced his departure. Rouse was formerly the chief-of-staff for former Democratic Senate leader Tom Daschle. McGarr is the chairman of Daschle’s political action committee.

    Obama White House won’t answer questions
    Liz Oxhorn, a White House spokesperson for the Recovery Act, declined to answer questions about what was discussed during that meeting or any other — including whether Rouse and other White House officials know about the Spinning Star project or were asked to intervene on its behalf.

    “Competitive Recovery Act funds are only awarded by experts at federal agencies following an internal merit-based review process,” she said in an e-mail, denying the White House had intervened in the process to award a loan guarantee.

    Patrick Dorton, a spokesperson for U.S. Renewable Energy Group, the U.S. partner in the windmill project, said neither McGarr nor any other member of the group ever asked the White House to intervene on behalf of their project.

    “US-REG has not asked any official in any branch of government to advocate on behalf of their project in the DOE loan guarantee process,” Dorton said. “This is a project that stands on its own merits.”

    Most of McGarr’s visits were related to his work as executive producer of the Library of Congress’ Gershwin Prize for Popular Music, which honored Stevie Wonder in 2009 and Paul McCartney this June, Dorton said in an e-mailed statement. Dorton also said a meeting at the White House in January attended by Boyd was for his involvement with a group lobbying for a renewable energy standard — a proposed federal requirement that a certain percentage of electricity come from renewable sources — but neither US-REG nor Spinning Star were mentioned.

    A $245 million ‘developer fee’
    According to Dorton’s statement, the four partners in US-REG each brought particular strengths to the deal: Cunningham has negotiated business deals in China; McGarr has worked in private equity; and O’Hanlon and Boyd have experience with green energy. That all four men are prominent in Washington and Democratic circles has nothing to do with their partnership, Dorton said.

    Together, McGarr, Cunningham, O’Hanlon and Boyd will own 51 percent of the Spinning Star wind farm, according to the joint venture agreement filed with the SEC by A-Power. But to earn that ownership stake in a project whose ultimate value is estimated at $2 billion, they won’t have to contribute any significant financial investment of their own.

    What US-REG must do to earn its “developer fee,” which SEC documents suggest could be worth as much as $244.8 million, is secure “all project rights, beneficial contracts, permits, permit applications and Consultant Information.”

    At an Oct. 29 press conference to announce the new joint venture, the top Chinese A-Power executive made it clear what each company in the deal needed to do to make their new project go forward.

    “To go deep and broader in our cooperation in clean energy, Shenyang Power Group and US-REG and (construction contractor) Cielo Wind must focus on execution and leveraging our relations with the respective governments of our two great nations,” Jinxiang Lu, A-Power’s CEO, said through a translator. Shenyang Power is a subsidiary of A-Power.

    Who is A-Power?
    A-Power Energy Generation Systems is a small Chinese manufacturer, founded in 2007 as China’s interest in green energy was beginning to take off. Like most Chinese green-energy equipment manufacturers, A-Power obtained most of its technology from companies outside of China — specifically, German wind turbine company Fuhrlander and General Electric (Msnbc.com is a joint venture between Microsoft and NBC Universal. GE is the parent company of NBC Universal). But what A-Power lacks in original or cutting-edge technology it makes up for in the apparent ability to summon the brute force of China’s newly developed manufacturing base.

    The company is based in Shenyang Province, a small northeastern province on the border with North Korea that has recently become a hub for Chinese manufacturing. Aside from a handful of deals in Southeast Asia, A-Power has supplied relatively few turbines, but claims to have the largest turbine factory in China, poised to build hundreds a year.

    On Sept. 29, a website owned by an A-Power subsidiary published pictures showing a ceremony and parade for what company officials said is the first turbine to be shipped to Texas, but in later filings with the SEC, the company said no turbines had been constructed.

    Some financing for the project may come from the Chinese Export-Import Bank, a Chinese government-backed agency set up to help finance deals that will help promote Beijing’s export policy, according to other press releases on the same company website.

    Related: Follow the money on the Stimulus Tracker

    But according to SEC filings by the company made last week, getting financing for the deal may hinge on whether the Department of Energy is willing to guarantee the loan. US-REG’s spokesman said the project has made it through the first phase of the loan guarantee program, but a Department of Energy spokesperson cautioned that, to date, the administration hasn’t give the project anything.

    “The project has not received a single dime of Recovery Act funding,” a Department of Energy statement said. “It has not applied for a tax grant under the 1603 program, has not completed the loan application process and has not been awarded a loan guarantee.”

    How Washington friends can help
    US-REG’s ability to help its new Chinese partners associate themselves with the Washington power players can be traced through a series of recent deals announced by the two companies in the year since they unveiled plans for the Spinning Star Wind Farm.

    Shortly after that announcement, the proposed project began inciting a kind of populist backlash. Several U.S. senators, led by Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., attacked the proposed plan in November as a misuse of U.S. stimulus dollars. US-REG originally predicted that the Spinning Star wind farm might create as many as 2,800 jobs — the vast majority being in China where the turbines would be built. As few as 40 long-term jobs might be created in the U.S., a point that Schumer hammered at.

    A friend in the Senate, a friend for the senator
    In November 2009, US-REG and A-Power announced a new deal, this one apparently carefully crafted to counter the charges that the only thing the project would yield was Chinese jobs. A-Power would build a new manufacturing facility — in Nevada. The new plant would employ 1,000 workers and manufacture turbines for the U.S. market. The factory proposal had virtually no details, such as where it would be, or how A-Power expected to sell turbines in the already competitive U.S. market when they were removing the biggest selling point in their business plan: cheap Chinese labor.

    But it was still heartily endorsed at the time by Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader.

    Representatives from US-REG and A-Power took pains to praise Reid, who was locked in a tight race to retain his seat, for his foresight and interest in creating green-collar jobs for Nevada. It was a winning situation for everyone involved.

    But on March 3, 2010, Schumer and four other Democratic senators introduced an amendment to the stimulus package that attempted to apply the law’s Buy American provision to the Section 1603 grant program, which would pay out the $450 million to the Spinning Star wind farm.

    A newspaper family joins the project
    Eight days later, on March 11, a news conference was held by the Spinning Star partners, again beating the drum for a new turbine factory in Nevada. Though the new announcement offered few new details, it did have another new partner — the real estate firm owned by the Greenspun family of Las Vegas, which besides being vocal in support of Harry Reid also owns the Las Vegas Sun newspaper. The newspaper published an op-ed by Brian Greenspun lauding Reid for his role in the midst of a tough election fight to lure a project with such massive job creation potential to Nevada.

    On March 18, Moses Boyd wrote a check for $29,940 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. The committee, controlled by Senate Democratic leadership, contributed $65,000 to Reid’s campaign after he added his endorsement to the A-Power project. On March 22, Boyd, O’Hanlon and two other members of their lobbying firm gave $4,900 in campaign contributions to Reid.

    Another press event promoting the proposed Nevada factory was held in April. This time it was a symbolic ribbon-cutting ceremony. Again, there were no new details, but Reid’s endorsement was prominently featured, and Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar appeared at the event. In June, Boyd and two other registered lobbyists at his firm made another $1,400 in donations to Reid’s campaign.

    On Oct. 12, the cooperative relationship between Reid and the Spinning Star wind farm partners culminated with a splashy campaign event for the Senate leader, hosted by Cappy McGarr. The event, held at a newly opened LED manufacturing plant in Henderson, Nev., owned by an unrelated company from Singapore, and which A-Power declared was its new temporary headquarters, featured Reid taking the stage between McGarr and A-Power CEO Lu and a Communist Party official from Shenyang.

    Reid’s office won’t answer questions
    Reid’s office declined to answer any questions about A-Power and US-REG despite multiple requests for comment. Dorton, the US-REG spokesman, flatly denied there was any connection between US-REG’s hefty campaign donations and Reid’s support. It was Reid who approached US-REG  about locating in Nevada, he said.

    “Once he and his staff learned A-Power was searching for a site to build a wind turbine assembly facility, they presented Nevada as an option,” Dorton said.

    Krumholz of the Center for Responsive Politics said this type of relationship — large donors with specific business needs establishing a relationship with a powerful politician who can help — is quite common.

    “It’s not out of the ordinary, but it may raise eyebrows,” Krumholz said.

    In this instance, she said, the two sides appear to have each had something specific to offer the other.

    “It was helpful to Reid to say, ‘We’ll help you raise money. We’ll serve up victory on a silver platter for you. We’ll bring green jobs to the state,’” Krumholz said. “It’s like a ready-made campaign platform — and it was accompanied by real dollars.”

    And the importance of getting Reid’s endorsement for their project cannot be overemphasized, she said.

    “To get the sanction of the most powerful man in the Senate — it’s priceless,” Krumholz said. “To say they have received his blessing will go a long way in Democratic circles.”

    The members of US-REG, including registered lobbyists O’Hanlon and Boyd, did go to Capitol Hill to promote their project, urging lawmakers not to support Schumer’s amendment, Dorton said. Registered lobbyists are required to report their contact with members of Congress and government agencies, but neither O’Hanlon nor Boyd reported lobbying for US-REG. Dorton acknowledged that US-REG’s members have gone to the Hill to talk about their project, but said there was no conflict of interest and all legally required disclosures have been made.

    A hand from the Steelworkers
    To further bolster the credibility of the Spinning Star project, the US-REG principals also sought to calm critics from the left.

    The United Steelworkers labor union initially opposed the possibility of any stimulus dollars going toward the Spinning Star wind farm, based on the plan to import the turbines from China. But in August, the union, which is typically one of the most stalwart supporters of Democratic causes and had previously supported Schumer’s amendment, suddenly made an about-face. Leo W. Gerard, the union’s president, announced he had signed an agreement with A-Power to ensure that the steel used in the Spinning Star project came only from American steel mills employing union workers.

    A representative from the Steelworkers did not reply to a request for comment, and Dorton referred questions about this deal to a press release issued by the Steelworkers in August. In the release, both A-Power’s Chinese executives and Gerard make it clear that it is US-REG that brought them to the table.

    “Through our partnership with U.S. Renewable Energy Group, we had the unique opportunity to meet President Gerard and understand his vision,” said Lu, the A-Power CEO.

    Noting it was the first time that the Steelworks teamed up with a Chinese company, Gerard heaped praise on, “the expertise and insight of Cappy McGarr and Ed Cunningham of the U.S. Renewable Energy Group who brought together this landmark cooperation.”

    Photos of a signing ceremony show all four members of US-REG watching Gerard and A-Power CEO Lu Jinxiang embrace.

    Because of the sheer size and weight of wind turbine towers — each one can weigh hundreds of tons — the likelihood that they would be imported to Texas from China was low to begin with, but the endorsement of the USW brought credibility to the project. It did nothing to change the fact that the most expensive, and labor-intensive, part of a turbine, the nacelle, will still come from China.

    The Chinese gain another friend, the former DNC chairman
    A-Power, the Chinese company, has found other friends in the Democratic Party, including at least prominent one with links to US-REG.

    In August, A-Power signed a new joint-venture agreement with Terry McAuliffe, the former chairman of the Democratic National Committee and one of the party’s leading power brokers. US-REG’s spokesman said none of the partners had anything to do with McAuliffe’s deal with A-Power.

    Throughout his career in Washington, US-REG partner John O’Hanlon has frequently found himself working closely with McAuliffe.  McAuliffe and O’Hanlon both did stints with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the early 1980s and worked in fundraising for former Democratic presidential candidate Dick Gephardt.

    O’Hanlon became a partner in McAuliffe’s law firm in 1992. The firm, McAuliffe, Kelly and Rafaelli, was one of the most prominent Democratic firms in Washington, D.C., and the target of criticism for earning hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees from foreign countries with abysmal human rights records to lobby on their behalf. When O’Hanlon left the firm in 1997, he founded a new one with John Rafaelli, McAuliffe’s old partner. O’Hanlon crossed professional paths with McAuliffe several more times throughout the 2000s, usually in their involvement with various national Democratic campaign groups.

    McAullife, who now serves as chairman of a green car and energy company, signed a development deal with A-Power on Aug. 2. The public details of the deal are thin, but on the A-Power website, it is described as an agreement to develop a new wind, solar or biomass energy joint venture. Pictures from the signing ceremony show McAuliffe with a group of A-Power executives, and the caption describes him as “a prominent politician, renowned political leader for the Democratic Party, financier and entrepreneur.”

    Dorton, the US-REG spokesman, acknowledged O’Hanlon and McAuliffe are friends, but said no one from US-REG was involved in making the connection.

    Russ Choma is a Washington reporter who writes frequently about climate and energy issues, transportation and stimulus spending. He previously reported that the majority of stimulus money for wind-power projects was going to foreign-owned developers, and that the majority of turbines being installed were built by foreign-owned manufacturers. ( Read those stories here.) And here on msnbc.com is his story on the Obama administration taking credit for wind projects that began in the Bush administration.

    You can reach Choma by e-mail, and discuss this story below.

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Germany Says Federal Reserve Heading `Wrong Way’ With Monetary Easing Push

    By: admin
    Published: October 24th, 2010

    From Bloomberg

    The Federal Reserve’s push toward easier monetary policy is the “wrong way” to stimulate growth and may amount to a manipulation of the dollar, German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle said.

    Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke yesterday gave Group of 20 finance ministers and central bankers meeting in Gyeongju, South Korea an overview of the U.S. central bank’s efforts to jumpstart the world’s largest economy. His strategy, which investors expect will soon include greater asset purchases, drew criticism at the talks, said Bruederle.

    “It’s the wrong way to try to prevent or solve problems by adding more liquidity,” Bruederle told reporters yesterday, saying that emerging-market officials were among the critics. Bruederle, a member of the Free Democratic Party, the junior partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government, stepped in for hospitalized Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble at the meeting.

    The debate over the Fed’s strategy comes as the G-20’s advanced nations sought to alleviate concerns over big swings in capital flows to emerging markets by promising to be “vigilant against excess volatility” in exchange rates. The U.S. central bank completed purchases of about $1.7 trillion of debt in March to support the recovery. The policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee next meets Nov. 2-3.

    Bill Gross, Pacific Investment Management Co.’s co-founder and manager of the world’s biggest mutual fund, said Oct. 8 on Bloomberg TV the central bank may buy about $100 billion in government debt a month, or $1.2 trillion over the next year.

    ‘Indirect Manipulation’

    “Excessive, permanent money creation in my opinion is an indirect manipulation of an exchange rate,” Bruederle said. The minister has taken a pro-market stance in his first year in office, criticizing state intervention in cases such as providing aid for General Motors Co.’s German Opel unit.

    read the rest here

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Report: In Obama’s Chicago, stimulus weatherization money buys shoddy work, widespread fraud

    By: admin
    Published: October 20th, 2010

    As TCE told you when the stimulus plan was approved initially  - the money are going to be stolen and no one is going to be held accountable.

    Also pay attention on the FACT that when the government bureaucrats are involved in paying for something they always over pay.

    Why should they care? They spend money that are not theirs…

    On the other hand the contractors are overcharging the government, because they know that they can

    Why do you think the college tuitions are going up? The cost of healthcare? It is because of the government involvement.

    Thats right – Just charge it on that “unlimited” government account

    From Washington Examiner
    By: BYRON YORK

    At ten of the 15 homes visited, Department inspectors found examples in which “a contractor had installed a 125,000 BTU boiler, but had billed CEDA for a 200,000 BTU boiler costing an estimated $1,000. more.” Another contractor “billed for almost four times the amount of drywall actually installed.” And another “installed 12 light bulbs but had billed CEDA for 20.” (The Department found that CEDA paid almost three times the retail price for each light bulb.) “Billing issues appeared to be pervasive,” the report concludes.

    read the rest here

    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

    Recent Entries

    Recent Comments

    Social Network









    the Cynical Economist at Blogged
    Wikio - Top Blogs
    Share Add to Technorati Favorites http://www.wikio.com TopOfBlogs